<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.livejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Squaresville</title>
  <link>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/</link>
  <description>Squaresville - LiveJournal.com</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:23:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator>
  <lj:journal>jangler_npl</lj:journal>
  <lj:journalid>7926884</lj:journalid>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  <atom10:link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/' />
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31750.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Bilingual puzzle</title>
  <link>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31750.html</link>
  <description>Think of two semi-synonymous phrases, one English, one not, which share the same consonants, but in different order (a la ROBIN WILLIAMS/YELLOW SUBMARINE, as found by Ed Pegg, Jr). I say &quot;semi-synonymous&quot; because one of the phrases is decidedly more formal than the other. The enumerations are (3&apos;1 2 6&apos;) and (3 4 2 *5).</description>
  <comments>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31750.html</comments>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31532.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Karaoke update</title>
  <link>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31532.html</link>
  <description>Four songs last night; first and last were good, middle two less so. My apologies to Messrs. Costello and Williams.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &quot;Lawyers, Guns, And Money&quot;--Warren Zevon&lt;br /&gt;2. &quot;Red Shoes&quot;--Elvis Costello&lt;br /&gt;3. &quot;It&apos;s The Most Wonderful Time Of The Year&quot;--Andy Williams&lt;br /&gt;4. &quot;The Sweetest Thing&quot;--U2</description>
  <comments>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/31532.html</comments>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>3</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/27304.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/27304.html</link>
  <description>Meme time. Reply to this entry with the word &quot;words&quot;, and I will reply with five words which remind me of you. Then post to your livejournal describing what those words mean to you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The words I got from &lt;span class=&apos;ljuser ljuser-name_hahathor&apos; lj:user=&apos;hahathor&apos; style=&apos;white-space: nowrap;&apos;&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://hahathor.livejournal.com/profile&apos;&gt;&lt;img src=&apos;http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif&apos; alt=&apos;[info]&apos; width=&apos;17&apos; height=&apos;17&apos; style=&apos;vertical-align: bottom; border: 0; padding-right: 1px;&apos; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://hahathor.livejournal.com/&apos;&gt;&lt;b&gt;hahathor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; were: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;cutid1&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Competitive&lt;/b&gt;: I really don&apos;t consider myself a competitive guy; the fact that it made the list may make me rethink that. In any case, I know I don&apos;t get bent out of shape about losing competitions/games/whatever, though I used to. Perhaps it is the case that sometimes, when I&apos;m in the middle of competing and I feel like I or my team may have a chance at winning, some of my more Type A tendencies may shine through. I guess I do usually sign up to be a &quot;runner&quot; rather than a &quot;walker&quot; for NPL extravaganzas, but I think I was a walker last year. Probably will be this year too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Akron&lt;/b&gt;: OK, so at one NPL convention, Will Shortz was running a game of &quot;Beat The Champ&quot;, wherein he reads off short wordplay teasers, and groups of people from opposite sides of a room try to answer them out loud the fastest. One of his teasers began &quot;What midwestern city...&quot; and before he could get another syllable out, someone shouted &quot;Akron!&quot;. Which turned out to be the correct answer--the teaser itself went on to say that the city would become a unit of currency if you moved the first letter to the end. The story became legendary, and somehow in the most-commonly told version I was the one who made the preternatural guess. But I *didn&apos;t*. I&apos;m pretty sure it was Tinhorn. So, as for what Akron means to me, it represents my most impressive achievement that I never actually achieved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Karaoke&lt;/b&gt;: It keeps me sane. Now that every one of the group of people who hold the weekly movie nights has moved across town (and I rarely feel like driving to the grocery store, much less through downtown), without karaoke I don&apos;t think I&apos;d have any social interaction. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Games Magazine&lt;/b&gt;: The source of everything good and decent in this world. The first year I joined the NPL, Dandr sent me a boxful of old issues of GAMES and its sister publications; I don&apos;t think I would have ever made a single puzzle if I hadn&apos;t seen the levels of art that could be achieved and wanted to replicate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Criticism&lt;/b&gt;: This is a tough one. I&apos;ve always been particular in my tastes when it comes to puzzles, and I haven&apos;t made too many friends in expressing those tastes. Twice I&apos;ve attempted to run a blog as a more critical counterpart to the sites of Amy, Rex, et al. and twice I&apos;ve found that it was a lot more time and effort than it was worth. I still think that the quality of the puzzles in existing publications leaves a lot to be desired, and that this is the result of a needlessly lax standard for what is expected from a crossword than from any lack of talented constructors, but I&apos;ve long since realized this isn&apos;t the sort of thing one can change opinions about or would even want to. I try to set pretty high standards for myself (witness the hyperbolic outburst about &quot;illegitimate&quot; crossword entries in my previous post), but I doubt I&apos;ll ever again take to proselytizing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://jangler-npl.livejournal.com/27304.html</comments>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>7</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
